Accounting before Accountability
Copyright policy )Accounting before Accountability
In this article, we will review several issues relating to the definition of “adequate yearly progress” (AYP), and its measurement, and offer some reasons why it may be prudent to separate the definition and measurement of AYP from its use in accountability. The design of accountability system includes general prescriptions about what data are relevant, policy questions that will guide the formulation of progress and productivity indicators based on students’ longitudinal test scores, and procedures for using the resulting indicators in accountability.
- Michigan State University United States
- University of Navarra Spain
Accountability systems, test de diagnóstico, Adecuate yearly progress, Estados Unidos, Productivity indicators, No child left behind, calidad de la enseñanza, L, evaluación, Education
Accountability systems, test de diagnóstico, Adecuate yearly progress, Estados Unidos, Productivity indicators, No child left behind, calidad de la enseñanza, L, evaluación, Education
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!