Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Orvosi Hetilaparrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Orvosi Hetilap
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Orvosi Hetilap
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Orvosi Hetilap
Article . 2011
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Distribution of multiple congenital abnormalities including anotia and microtia

Authors: László, Paput; Judit, Falvai; Ferenc, Bánhidy;

Distribution of multiple congenital abnormalities including anotia and microtia

Abstract

To evaluate cases with unclassified multiple congenital abnormalities including microtia and anotia as component congenital abnormalities in order to reveal the characteristic pattern of other associated component congenital abnormalities and to make an attempt to establish a registry diagnosis on the pattern of associated congenital abnormalities and to stimulate the establishment of an international registry of cases with unclassified multiple congenital abnormalities comprising of microtia and anotia. Methods: The large population-based dataset of the Hungarian Case-Control Surveillance of Congenital Abnormalities, 1980–1996. Results: A total of 156 cases with unclassified multiple congenital abnormalities including microtia and anotia were analyzed according to the number of 2–9 component congenital abnormalities. The comparison of the distribution and frequency of component congenital abnormalities in these cases showed significant differences from the data of other unclassified multiple congenital abnormalities. Of the 156 cases, registry diagnosis was possible in 48 (30.8%) cases. Conclusions: The evaluation of available dataset of unclassified multiple anotia and microtia may help the delineation of new syndromes and associations with better prognosis and recurrence risk estimation, thus finally a better chance for their prevention. Orv. Hetil., 2011, 152, 1399–1416.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Hungary, Humans, Abnormalities, Multiple, Ear, Registries, Ear, External, Congenital Abnormalities, Congenital Microtia, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
bronze