Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

OPLC comparison of methods for aqueous extraction ofSennae foliumandTiliae flosplant samples

Authors: Ádám Dávid; Emil Mincsovics; Katalin Pápai; Krisztina Ludányi; István Antal; Imre Klebovich;

OPLC comparison of methods for aqueous extraction ofSennae foliumandTiliae flosplant samples

Abstract

A new, simplified open-vessel microwave extraction (OVME) method has been used to prepare aqueous extracts of Sennae folium and Tiliae flos . For comparison, extracts were also prepared by classic pharmacopeial methods — decoctum, infusion, and ultrasound extraction. The extracts prepared by the different extraction methods were compared by over-pressured layer chromatography (OPLC), followed by video and UV-densitometric evaluation. We demonstrated the applicability of rapid OPLC separation combined with UV densitometry for comparison of extracts prepared by different methods. OPLC-UV is suitable for rapid, non-destructive investigation of multicomponent preparations of biological origin.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!