Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Lightweight Concrete Modification Factor for Shear Friction

Authors: Lesley H. Sneed; Dane M. Shaw;

Lightweight Concrete Modification Factor for Shear Friction

Abstract

This report describes the results of a study initiated to examine the influence of concrete unit weight on the direct shear transfer across an interface of concretes cast at different times. This type of interface is common with structural precast concrete connections, such as corbels, for which shear friction design provisions are commonly used. Increasing use of lightweight aggregate concretes prompted this investigation to determine the appropriateness of current shear friction design provisions with respect to all-lightweight and sand-lightweight concrete. The experimental investigation included 36 push-off test specimens, each of which was constructed with a cold-joint at the interface shear plane. Test variables included unit weight of concrete (108, 120, and 145 pcf), target compressive strength of concrete (5000 and 8000 psi), and interface condition (smooth or roughened). A constant amount of reinforcing steel was provided across the shear plane. Results suggest that concrete unit weight did not play a significant role in the interface shear strength for the cold-joint specimens in this study. Results were also compared with shear friction design provisions in both the ACI 318 code and the PCI Design Handbook. Shear strengths computed using the coefficient of friction µ approach were conservative for the sand-lightweight and all-lightweight cold-joint specimens in this study. The value of the effective coefficient of friction µₑ computed using the PCI Design Handbook approach was found to be conservative for both roughened and smooth non-monolithic interfaces for each concrete type. Finally, the use of the lightweight concrete modification factor in the calculation for the effective coefficient of friction µₑ was found to be conservative for the sand-lightweight and all-lightweight cold-joint specimens in this study.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!