
doi: 10.15488/3303
The generation of digital Orthophotos now days can be done with aerial, but also very high resolution space imagery. For a real competition the geometric and radiometric quality has to be on the same level. Different QuickBird images have been used for the generation of orthophotos with 1m pixel size. The whole procedure from the orientation up to the final step has been analyzed in detail. Rational polynomial coefficients (RPC) and bundle orientation using orbit information was used for the handling of QuickBird Basic and Standard Imagery. The special problems of individual and combined scenes are analyzed. QuickBird Images covering quite different areas were used. The effect of varying control point distributions on the accuracy, determined with independent check points was studied. Different sources of ground control like digital orthophoto quads, existing information from airborne photo flights and GPS-control points have been used. The required height information came from different digital elevation models (DEM) and ground survey. Satisfying results have been achieved. © 2004 International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. All rights reserved.
Satellites, Image coding, Orbits, Surveying, Very high resolution, Dewey Decimal Classification::500 | Naturwissenschaften::520 | Astronomie, Kartographie, Orthoimages, Satellite, Rock mechanics, Orientation, Independent check points, Matching, High resolution, Antennas, Digital elevation model, Rational polynomial coefficients, DEM/DTM, Konferenzschrift, Orthoimage, Crystal orientation
Satellites, Image coding, Orbits, Surveying, Very high resolution, Dewey Decimal Classification::500 | Naturwissenschaften::520 | Astronomie, Kartographie, Orthoimages, Satellite, Rock mechanics, Orientation, Independent check points, Matching, High resolution, Antennas, Digital elevation model, Rational polynomial coefficients, DEM/DTM, Konferenzschrift, Orthoimage, Crystal orientation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
