
This study aims to examine the legal protection of copyright creators of photographic works whose moral and economic rights are violated on the internet according to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. This research method uses a normative juridical research approach, namely research that refers to the legal norms that exist in statutory regulations, literature, expert opinion and papers. The results in this study indicate that photographic copyright infringement is still rife, referring to one of Aryono's cases, where photos on his personal Instagram were taken by online media for commercial purposes. In this case there was a violation of moral rights and economic rights. In the Copyright Law, it is explained in article 5 that moral rights are attached to the creator to maintain the creator's right which is valid for life and if used for commercial purposes, it is explained in Article 9 that the creator has economic rights, that is, everyone is required to obtain the author's permission to carry out commercial use of this protection. valid for 50 years.Keywords: Photographic Copyright, Copyright Infringement
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
