
The aim of this paper is to investigate intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making problems where the attribute values provided by experts are expressed in intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, and the weight information about the experts is to be determined. We present a new method to derive the weights of experts and rank the preference order of alternatives based on projection models. We first derive the weights of the decision makers according to the projection of the individual decision on the ideal decision. The expert has a large weight if his evaluation value is close to the ideal decision, and has a small weight if his evaluation value is far from the ideal decision. Then, based on the weighted projection of the alternatives on the intuitionistic fuzzy ideal solution (IFIS), we develop a straightforward and practical algorithm to rank alternatives. Furthermore, we extend the developed model and algorithm to the multiple attribute group decision making problems with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Finally, an illustrative example is given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
