Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A quantitative assay for the cytoplasmic androgen receptor using [3H]dihydrotestosterone in the presence of NAD+-nucleosidase

Authors: H, Moeller; G, Oettling; B, Fiederer; G, Brügmann;

A quantitative assay for the cytoplasmic androgen receptor using [3H]dihydrotestosterone in the presence of NAD+-nucleosidase

Abstract

Abstract. In prostatic cytosol DHT1 is metabolized to 5α-androstane-3α (or β), 17α-diols with a half life of 2 h even at 4°C. Thus, [3H]DHT appears to be a poor marker for a quantitative assessment of androgen receptors (AR). Methyltrienolone (R1881) seems to be advantageous as it is not metabolized. However, because of considerable binding to progestin receptors, assays using [3H]R1881 are not specific for AR in tissues containing progestin receptors. We, therefore, developed a specific assay for AR using [3H]DHT (14 nm) as marker, where metabolism of DHT is prevented by pre-incubation with NAD+-nucleosidase. The [3H]DHT-receptor complex is separated from free, SHBG-bound and unspecifically bound [3H]DHT by agar gel electrophoresis. The binding sites of high affinity and low capacity are characterized by suppression with unlabelled R1881 (2 μm) in a parallel assay. Under these conditions DHT and R1881 appear to have the same kinetics of association and dissociation. Weighted non-linear regression analysis of specific binding capacity at various ligand concentrations reveals that in rat prostatic cytosol the affinity of DHT (Kd = 0.405 ± 0.0839 nm) is significantly higher (P < 0.01) than that of R1881 (Kd = 1.25 ± 0.271 nm).

Related Organizations
Keywords

Electrophoresis, Agar Gel, Male, Cytoplasm, Receptors, Steroid, Prostate, Dihydrotestosterone, Rats, Inbred Strains, Metribolone, Ligands, Rats, NAD+ Nucleosidase, Receptors, Androgen, Animals, Castration, Chromatography, Thin Layer, Estrenes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!