
doi: 10.15291/csi.4615
The letters exchanged between Byzantine emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus (913-959) and his close friend Theodore, Bishop of Cyzicus, are of the utmost importance, representing the only preserved example of authentic writings from the emperor. Other than the fact that the correspondence offers details concerning the relationship between Theodore and Porphyrogenitus and their personal lives, it also provides a good foundation for the study of Porphyrogenitus’ style of writing, which is very useful considering that the authorship of the emperor’s literary inheritance is still the object of scholarly discussion. The corpus of this study is made up of ten letters written by Theodore and addressed to Constantine (whose letters of reply have not been preserved) from the Vindobonensis Collection and correspondence between Theodore and Porphyrogenitus from the Athos Collection (ten of Theodore’s and eight of Constantine’s letters). Epistolary topoi found in the letters will be analyzed and divided into two groups: contemplative and linguistic. The aim is primarily to present the features of Porphyrogenitus’ letter-writing style, but also that of his correspondent, with special reference to the extent to which rhetorical recommendations were followed when composing letters.
Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, epistolary topoi, pismovni toposi, Theodore of Cyzicus, bizantska epistolografija, grčka pismovna frazeologija, Greek epistolary phraseology, Teodor iz Kizika, Byzantine epistolography, Konstantin VII. Porfirogenet
Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, epistolary topoi, pismovni toposi, Theodore of Cyzicus, bizantska epistolografija, grčka pismovna frazeologija, Greek epistolary phraseology, Teodor iz Kizika, Byzantine epistolography, Konstantin VII. Porfirogenet
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
