
Studying protein interaction networks of all proteins in an organism ("interactomes") remains one of the major challenges in modern biomedicine. Such information is crucial to understanding cellular pathways and developing effective therapies for the treatment of human diseases. Over the past two decades, diverse biochemical, genetic, and cell biological methods have been developed to map interactomes. In this review, we highlight basic principles of interactome mapping. Specifically, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of individual assays, how to select a method appropriate for the problem being studied, and provide general guidelines for carrying out the necessary follow-up analyses. In addition, we discuss computational methods to predict, map, and visualize interactomes, and provide a summary of some of the most important interactome resources. We hope that this review serves as both a useful overview of the field and a guide to help more scientists actively employ these powerful approaches in their research.
Mammals, Medicine (General), protein‐protein interactions (PPIs), QH301-705.5, Reviews, Computational Biology, Proteins, interactome mapping, bioinformatics, proteomics, R5-920, Protein Interaction Mapping, Animals, Humans, Protein Interaction Maps, Biology (General), PPI technologies
Mammals, Medicine (General), protein‐protein interactions (PPIs), QH301-705.5, Reviews, Computational Biology, Proteins, interactome mapping, bioinformatics, proteomics, R5-920, Protein Interaction Mapping, Animals, Humans, Protein Interaction Maps, Biology (General), PPI technologies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 255 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
