
doi: 10.1520/stp29328s
A statistical analysis was performed on fatigue test data for aluminum, titanium, steel, and nickel materials. The data for the titanium, steel, and nickel were obtained from spectrum fatigue tests, whereas the data for aluminum were obtained from both constant amplitude and spectrum fatigue tests. The analyzed data consisted of a total of 553 S-N test groups with 2417 specimens and 1288 spectrum test groups with approximately 5000 specimens. The distribution of logarithmic standard deviation of fatigue life for these test groups was analyzed with normal, logarithmic, and two-parameter Weibull probability distribution functions and with 2-deg polynominal equations. The best fit was evaluated using the coefficient of correlation and the chi-squared goodness of fit test. None of the distribution functions or polynomial equations provided the best fit for all of the distributions of the logarithmic standard deviation of fatigue life for the selected sets of test groups. A comparison is also made of three methods of calculating scatter factors.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
