
doi: 10.1520/jfs12684j
pmid: 2661720
Abstract Five hundred psychological autopsies on equivocal (suicide versus accident) deaths were reviewed to ascertain which factors are significant in making the determination between suicidal and accidental deaths. Factors varied in relative importance according to the method used to cause death. Significant factors included life-style, recent stress, suicidal communications, previous self-destructive behaviors, history of depression, and obvious factors from the physical evidence such as large amounts of drugs in the blood. Although the court-provided decision guideline is “a preponderance of the evidence,” in practice, the assembled evidence is often used to construct a “most credible” scenario to explain the death.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Poisoning, Forensic Medicine, Middle Aged, Los Angeles, Decision Support Techniques, Asphyxia, Suicide, Accidents, Humans, Female, Wounds, Gunshot, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Poisoning, Forensic Medicine, Middle Aged, Los Angeles, Decision Support Techniques, Asphyxia, Suicide, Accidents, Humans, Female, Wounds, Gunshot, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
