Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Failure Criterion for Thick Multifastener Graphite-Epoxy Composite Joints

Authors: WS Johnson; JE Masters; D Cohen; MW Hyer; MJ Shuart; OH Griffin; C Prasad; +1 Authors

Failure Criterion for Thick Multifastener Graphite-Epoxy Composite Joints

Abstract

A method for accurately predicting the strength of multifastener, thick composite joints is discussed. The method is based on the average stress criterion applied around the hole circumference. Basic laminate strength data are obtained from single-fastener and reduced-section notched specimens. Using ABAQUS finite element analyses (FEA), the stress-field distribution around the fastener-loaded hole in both the single-fastener and multifastener joints is determined. The single-fastener test data in conjunction with this FEA and the average stress criterion are then used to predict the multifastener joint strength. Multifastener joint strength of three different laminate lay-ups is predicted to within 1% accuracy. However, the results show that the average stress criterion cannot accurately predict the location of failure initiation. In the current investigation, the maximum strain criterion is used to locate possible sites of failure initiation. When this information is used in conjunction with the average stress criterion, the predicted multifastener joint strength based on single-fastener net-tension data is reasonably accurate.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!