
Abstract We calibrate Heston stochastic volatility model to real market data using several optimization techniques. We compare both global and local optimizers for different weights showing remarkable differences even for data (DAX options) from two consecutive days. We provide a novel calibration procedure that incorporates the usage of approximation formula and outperforms significantly other existing calibration methods. We test and compare several simulation schemes using the parameters obtained by calibration to real market data. Next to the known schemes (log-Euler, Milstein, QE, Exact scheme, IJK) we introduce also a new method combining the Exact approach and Milstein (E+M) scheme. Test is carried out by pricing European call options by Monte Carlo method. Presented comparisons give an empirical evidence and recommendations what methods should and should not be used and why. We further improve the QE scheme by adapting the antithetic variates technique for variance reduction.
Numerical optimization and variational techniques, 65k10, Numerical methods (including Monte Carlo methods), monte carlo simulation, 91g60, calibration, 91g20, Heston model, Stochastic ordinary differential equations (aspects of stochastic analysis), Derivative securities (option pricing, hedging, etc.), QA1-939, heston model, 60h35, 60h10, stochastic volatility, option pricing, Mathematics, Computational methods for stochastic equations (aspects of stochastic analysis), Monte Carlo simulation
Numerical optimization and variational techniques, 65k10, Numerical methods (including Monte Carlo methods), monte carlo simulation, 91g60, calibration, 91g20, Heston model, Stochastic ordinary differential equations (aspects of stochastic analysis), Derivative securities (option pricing, hedging, etc.), QA1-939, heston model, 60h35, 60h10, stochastic volatility, option pricing, Mathematics, Computational methods for stochastic equations (aspects of stochastic analysis), Monte Carlo simulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
