
pmid: 11350025
Measurement of lipoprotein lipase activity in postheparin plasma is generally accompanied by moderate within-run variation CV(W-R) (<10%) and higher between-run variation CV(B-R) (5-25%). A calibration system was introduced in order to improve the reproducibility of measurements and to compare lipoprotein lipase activities from different days. Every day a calibration curve for lipoprotein lipase activity was constructed. Fifteen calibration curves designed over 2 years, show linearity over the whole biological spectrum and a considerable reduction of between-run variation in lipoprotein lipase activity, from 42% to 5.3% as estimated from two control postheparin plasma samples. The lipoprotein lipase calibration system is an easy and very cheap arrangement, which makes it possible to compare lipoprotein lipase activities achieved over years. When the lipoprotein lipase control values are compared with reference lipoprotein lipase samples determined in other lipase laboratories, the calibration-control system becomes an important tool for reducing analytical bias. The article reviews the original analytical criteria of catalytic measurement of lipoprotein lipase activity and describes the implementation of the calibration-control system. We describe a model for reduction of the analytical variability in the measurement of lipoprotein lipase activity. Other standardization efforts need to be made in the future, especially to define the reference material for calibration.
Lipoprotein lipase activity, Observer Variation, Calibration system, Heparin, Analytical between-run variation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Lipoprotein Lipase, Calibration, Animals, Humans, Cattle, Analytical within-run variation
Lipoprotein lipase activity, Observer Variation, Calibration system, Heparin, Analytical between-run variation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Lipoprotein Lipase, Calibration, Animals, Humans, Cattle, Analytical within-run variation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
