Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Mechanisms of Antigen Presentation

Authors: P E, Jensen;

Mechanisms of Antigen Presentation

Abstract

AbstractT-lymphocytes recognize short peptide antigens bound stably to polymorphic major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-encoded glycoproteins expressed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APC). Two general pathways have evolved to generate peptide-MHC complexes. The MHC class II antigen processing pathway provides a mechanism for sampling proteins present in endosomal compartments. CD4+ regulatory T-cells recognize peptides bound to MHC class II molecules, which are selectively expressed in specialized APC that have efficient mechanisms for uptake of microbial antigens, and express costimulatory molecules required for activating naive T-cells. CD8+ T-cells recognize peptides bound to MHC class I molecules. Class I molecules are widely expressed and bind peptides derived from the normal turnover of cellular proteins, providing a mechanism to display a sampling of cellular components to be monitored for abnormalities by cytotoxic T-cells. Specialized accessory proteins influence the efficiency of antigen presentation and the specificity of immune responses through their roles in generating peptides, targeting antigen and MHC glycoproteins to selected intracellular compartments, and by direct participation in the peptide-loading mechanism. It has recently been discovered that some viruses have evolved ways to inhibit or subvert discrete steps in antigen processing, providing a mechanism to evade immune recognition.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Major Histocompatibility Complex, Antigen Presentation, Viruses, Humans, Antigens

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!