
In this contribution different possibilities to handle the internal cost distribution amongst various participants within a consortium are regarded. Either the cross access fee model or the calculation on the basis of FTEs are taken into consideration as well. The distribution is based on the usage principle, because between the different possible models it seems to be the most adequate solution. After basic theoretical reflections, the proposed models are calculated on the basis of two existing examples. Hereby it is shown that, depending on the preselected parameters, very different results could be possible. Which formulation is to be choosen greatly depends on factors which seem to be more political than based on pure economic objectives.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
