Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.3...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.3366/edinbu...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1515/978139...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Digital Technology

Authors: Mihaela-Alexandra Tudor; Stefan Bratosin;

Digital Technology

Abstract

3–5 sentences, or around 120 words and no more than 200 words Christian institutions have rapidly adopted emerging forms of digital and social media to mediate religious communication in new ways. Media usage can provide a source of renewal and strengthen believers’ faith, but religious organisations will need to learn new skills, encourage supporters to engage online, and create high-quality resources. Social media allows believers to engage in evangelism as well as participate in a Christian counterculture. At the same time, it allows for media influencers to become sources of religious authority outside traditional religious institutions. Although different patterns of usage exist, religious communication on social media can often be viewed as having a complementary relationship with offline religious participation. In Eastern and Southern Europe, Evangelical and Pentecostal/Charismatic denominations have typically made more effective use of social media than the Orthodox, Catholics, and mainline Protestants, suggesting that less centralised and hierarchical expressions of Christianity can more easily adapt themselves to the online world. Rather than reacting fearfully to new technological developments, this essay encourages Christians view it as a useful tool for collaborative engagement and communication between religious institutions and their members.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!