
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of comorbidities increases with age but preference-based utilities are generally obtained from cohorts who have a single condition. This can cause problems when populating health states in economic models which represent more than one condition. Analysts use the mean utilities from the cohorts with the single conditions to estimate the mean utility for a cohort with comorbidities. There is currently no consensus on which is the most appropriate method to combine these data and the different techniques can produce very different results. OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of different methods (minimum, multiplicative, additive, a linear regression) used to estimate health state utility values for comorbid health conditions.
Health Care, FOS: Economics and business, 140208 Health Economics
Health Care, FOS: Economics and business, 140208 Health Economics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
