
This paper explores the concept of the Resource-Based View (RBV) of strategy development. It presents a historical perspective on the reasons for its growth and then examines its main elements in order to identify its contribution to the strategic process. In particular, it investigates the claim that the RBV constitutes the dominant paradigm for the future development of strategic thinking. Five significant difficulties with the RBV are identified and their implications are discussed in the context of such a claim.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
