
This paper aims to indicate the relevance of anatomy of bank financial condition in enhancing bank going concern opinion. Within the lens of the audit risk model, implying the need to confer credibility to financial statements, statutory audit pursues processes leading to audit opinion to reflect the going concern status of an audited entity. Critically, the demise of banks with clean audit report during the 2008–2009 global banking crises suggests the need to strengthen the current basis for formulating audit opinion with factors which prove useful in characterising the underlying nature of bank financial condition. Previous studies identified these anatomic factors as market presence, macro-economic condition, deposit fragility, prudence, earnings quality, market power and capital confidence (Njoku and Inanga, 2010). Incorporating these factors in the auditor’s judgement process should enhance the effectiveness of audit opinion.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
