
pmid: 18048152
The TATA box has been used successfully to identify a transcription start site (TSS) and thereby a promoter. Unfortunately, there are many substrings which fit the profile of a TATA box and such substrings are called putative TATA boxes. We have applied linear and non linear classifiers for discriminating TATA box from putative TATA boxes and have compared their performances. We have also investigated the influence of the length of the pair of sequences flanking a putative TATA box on the prediction accuracy. The techniques we have presented in this paper are general enough to be applicable to other domains or to other genomes.
Binding Sites, Models, Statistical, Transcription, Genetic, Amino Acid Motifs, Reproducibility of Results, Bayes Theorem, Plants, Genes, Plant, TATA Box, Predictive Value of Tests, Neural Networks, Computer, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Algorithms, Genome, Plant, Probability
Binding Sites, Models, Statistical, Transcription, Genetic, Amino Acid Motifs, Reproducibility of Results, Bayes Theorem, Plants, Genes, Plant, TATA Box, Predictive Value of Tests, Neural Networks, Computer, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Algorithms, Genome, Plant, Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
