<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
The meta-analysis by Singh and colleagues tries to quantify the risk of serious adverse cardiovascular events with varenicline.[1][1] Many representations of this risk have been disseminated, including a large increase (number needed to harm [NNH] 28) extrapolated from applying the odds ratio from
Cardiovascular Diseases, Quinoxalines, Humans, Nicotinic Agonists, Benzazepines, Varenicline
Cardiovascular Diseases, Quinoxalines, Humans, Nicotinic Agonists, Benzazepines, Varenicline
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |