
The meta-analysis by Singh and colleagues tries to quantify the risk of serious adverse cardiovascular events with varenicline.[1][1] Many representations of this risk have been disseminated, including a large increase (number needed to harm [NNH] 28) extrapolated from applying the odds ratio from
Cardiovascular Diseases, Quinoxalines, Humans, Nicotinic Agonists, Benzazepines, Varenicline
Cardiovascular Diseases, Quinoxalines, Humans, Nicotinic Agonists, Benzazepines, Varenicline
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
