Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Co-production of an evidence map of engaged research

Authors: Human Sciences Research Council;

Co-production of an evidence map of engaged research

Abstract

The National Development Plan (NDP) highlights the critical role of science, technology, and innovation in tackling South Africa’s pressing social challenges. Researchers are increasingly encouraged to focus on producing research and innovation outcomes that are ethically sound, sustainable, and aligned with societal needs and values. Engaged research has emerged as a key framework to achieve this, emphasising collaborative and participatory knowledge co-creation between researchers and stakeholders such as communities, civil society, government agencies, industry, and the public. This approach contrasts with traditional research methods by fostering continuous engagement throughout the research cycle, which enhances the relevance, uptake, and societal impact of research. A central driver of this shift towards engaged research is the growing emphasis on research impact — ensuring that research investments yield tangible benefits to society by influencing products, processes, services, and public issues. Engaged research facilitates this by enabling co-production of knowledge, where stakeholders are involved in shaping research questions, methods, and interpretations, thus ensuring readiness to apply the findings. The Department of Science, Technology and Innovation (DSTI) and the National Research Foundation (NRF) are committed to advancing engaged research within South Africa’s National System of Innovation (NSI). However, efforts have often been fragmented. To address this, the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) has launched the Mainstreaming Engaged Research through the NSI project, aimed at developing a cohesive strategy to promote and integrate engaged research within the NSI. The project consists of two connected streams of work.

Keywords

Co-production of an evidence map of engaged research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!