Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Beyoglu Eye Journalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Beyoglu Eye Journal
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Beyoglu Eye Journal
Article . 2018
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Consistency of Ocular Palpation Tonometry with Goldman Applanation Tonometry and Its Reproducibility by Separate Examiners

Authors: Muhittin Taşkapili; Mehmet Özveren; Cigdem Altan; Beril Tülü Aygün; Gonul Karatas Durusoy;

Consistency of Ocular Palpation Tonometry with Goldman Applanation Tonometry and Its Reproducibility by Separate Examiners

Abstract

INTRODUCTION[|]Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) remains to be the best known modifiable risk factor for glaucoma. Ocular palpation tonometry (OPT) is an old, fast and simple method for IOP measurement. Our aim is to investigate accuracy, reproducibility of ocular palpation tonometry and its suitability to be used for screening purposes.[¤]METHODS[|]Consecutive patients without corneal pathology and glaucoma diagnosis history were included in the study. After routine ophthalmologic examination the IOP was measured by an ophthalmology specialist with Goldmann applanation tonomety (GAT). Later a blinded other ophthalmology specialist and a resident evaluated the same patients' IOP with ocular palpation tonometry. Agreement between GAT and OPT, reproducibility of OPT were evaluated using Cohen Kappa Analysis.[¤]RESULTS[|]214 eyes of 107 patients were included in the study with a mean IOP of 16.4+-3.6 (min: 8, max: 27) mmHg with GAT. OPT measurements by the resident ophthalmologist and the ophthalmology specialist were in concordance with GAT for 44.4% and 50.5% of the evaluations, respectively. We couldn't detect a significant kappa value for the agreement between GAT and OPT measurements by the resident ophthalmologist (p=0.333). Whereas a slight agreement was found between GAT and OPT measurements by the ophthalmology specialist (K=0.176, p=0.001). OPT measurements showed slight reproducibility (K=0.153, p=0.009).[¤]DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION[|]Ocular palpation tonometry has low reliability, reproducibility and is not suitable to be used as a screening test. Except obligatory states, it should not be used as a primary and only test, and must be verified by other methods.[¤]

Keywords

Ophthalmology, ocular palpation tonometry, tactile tonometry, RE1-994, glaucoma screening, intraocular pressure

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold