Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Can Steel Fibers Replace Transverse Reinforcements in Reinforced Concrete Beams?

Can Steel Fibers Replace Transverse Reinforcements in Reinforced Concrete Beams?

Abstract

Steel fiber reinforced concretes currently used do not have enough post-cracking tensile strength to be used alone, without main reinforcement (rebars), in a beam. On the other hand, replacement of the secondary reinforcement (stirrups) seems promising. The use of fibers would save considerable time and would facilitate placement in highly reinforced structures. A large experimental program was carried out to quantify the mechanical contribution of fibers in beams. In a first step, five large scale double-T-girders were tested, with the transverse reinforcement varied - concrete only, stirrups, or fibers. A global optical method, stereophotogrammetry, was used to monitor cracking. It showed a mainly mode I crack opening process. Furthermore, these tests suggested a scale effect linked to the height of the beam: the higher the height of the beam, the wider the crack opening at failure, i.e. the smaller the residual stress carried by the fibers. These findings lead to optimize both material and structure in regard to shear behavior. A high-strength steel fiber reinforced concrete was used in small rectangular beams, 0.25-m high, to provide high residual stress of the material and small crack opening at failure. For both types of beams--T-girders and rectangular beams--the mix was optimized using the Baron-Lesage method and the mechanical characterization of the material was conducted using a uniaxial tensile test monitored by the rate of the crack opening. A method of analysis based on a block mechanism is proposed and compares well with experiments.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!