Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Strengthening Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Laminates

Strengthening Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Laminates

Abstract

The behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with various types of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) laminates is presented. The experimental program included strengthening and testing 24 simply supported rectangular cross section beams. Each beam was initially loaded above its cracking load. The cracked beams were strengthened with FRP laminates and then tested until complete failure. Five available strengthening systems of various types of carbon/glass fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP/GFRP) strengthening materials were used. These materials included two types of CFRP sheets, bi- and unidirectional GFRP sheets, and CFRP plates. The effects of strengthening on deflection, failure load and failure mode, strain, and beam ductility are discussed. In addition, the influence of different numbers of FRP layers, type of epoxy, and strengthening pattern on the behavior of beams was examined. The ratio of absorbed energy at failure to total energy, or energy ratio, was used as a measure of beam ductility. It is concluded that, in addition to the longitudinal layers, the fibers oriented in the vertical direction forming a U-shape around the beam cross section significantly reduce beam deflections and increase beam load carrying capacity. Furthermore, the presence of vertical and horizontal sheets, together with a proper epoxy, can lead to a doubling of the ultimate load carrying capacity of the beam. However, all the strengthened beams experienced brittle failure, mandating a higher factor of safety in design.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!