Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Superplasticized Microcement Grouts

Superplasticized Microcement Grouts

Abstract

This paper examines the rheological and mechanical behavior of superplasticized microcement grouts to be used for the consolidation of porous systems (e.g. sand deposits, masonry walls of historical buildings). Five micro cements were used: they differed in chemical composition of the clinker, type of mineral addition (natural pozzolan or silica fume), and particle size distribution. Three different superplasticizing chemical admixtures - acrylic, napthalene, and melamine bases - were used, all with an active polymer content of 0.4% by mass of cement. The following properties of the grouts were investigated: fluidity (Marsh cone), compressive strength, stability (bleeding test). The acrylic polymer proved to be more effective than the naphtalene and melamine based products in reducing the mixing water to produce a given initial fluidity. Furthermore, the grouts produced with this superplasticizer displayed a lower fluidity loss with time. The performance of a specific mixture was also strongly dependent on the fineness of the binder and on the type of mineral addition. The compressive strength of the hardened grouts was primarily affected - especially at latter ages - by the water-binder ratio, independently of the type of superplasticizer. None of the mixtures considered showed any significant bleeding. A limited number of injection tests in columns of dense sand were also performed. For a given water binder ratio, the groutability of a mixture was greatly improved using the acrylic based superplasticizer in place of the melamine- and naphtalene-based products.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!