Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Design Considerations for Slab-Column Connections in Seismic Zones

Design Considerations for Slab-Column Connections in Seismic Zones

Abstract

The transfer of shearing forces and moments between concrete flat slabs and columns can produce brittle punching failure. Slab-column connections must satisfy adequate strength against punching failure. In seismic zones, the connections are expected to undergo deformations into the inelastic range and, hence, it is necesary to design connections with adequate strength and ductility. In addition, the connections must be able to undergo a specified limit of interstory drift without punching failure. The ductility and drift requirements that must be adhered to in design are discussed. Tests reported in the literature show that the strength under cyclic moment transfer is less than the strength under monotonic loading. For an earthquake-resistant structure, the design must be based on the strength under cyclic loading. Test results are reviewed and discussed. As an application, a hypothetical structure is designed according to American Concrete Institute (ACI) Building Code (ACI 318-89). The structure is subjected to the 1940 Elcentro ground motion, and time-history dynamic analysis is performed. The results show that to obtain adequate strength, drift capacity, and ductile behavior of a slab-column connection without shear reinforcement, it is necessary in most cases to increase substantially the slab thickness in the connection region beyond the minimum thickness required to control deflections by providing shear capitals. The disadvantages of shear captials can be avoided by using shear reinforcement.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!