Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Laboratory Evaluation of Nuclear Gage for Measurement of Water and Cement Content of Fresh Concrete

Laboratory Evaluation of Nuclear Gage for Measurement of Water and Cement Content of Fresh Concrete

Abstract

A laboratory test program was undertaken to determine the effects of variation in concrete constituents and proportions on the response of a nuclear water-cement content gage. A total of 14 separate test series were evaluated in the program. The evaluations included study of the effects of the following variables on the nuclear gage's determination of cement and water contents: air content, hold time, Class C and F fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, maximum size of coarse aggregate, limestone coarse and fine aggregates, basalt coarse aggregate, and temperature. Testing has shown that the cement content probe is sensitive to all materials containing calcium atoms; therefore, the gage must be calibrated with exactly the same materials as will be used on the job in question. While the water probe is, in theory, only sensitive to hydrogen atoms, there are some effects from other materials; therefore, calibrations using job materials are also required. With proper calibration, the cement gage is capable of determining cement content of fresh concrete to within approximately 10-20 lb/cu yd (6-12 kg/cu m). The water gage is capable of determining water content to within approximately 2-4 lb/cu yd (1-2 kg/cu m). From the predicted standard errors in water and cement contents, an error in calculated water-cement ratio of as much as 0.03 may be expected. As entrained air decreases concrete density, which appears to have an effect on the gage response, it is necessary to control air content with the gage within very close tolerances (+ or - 1%) in both lab calibrations and field work.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!