Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Fatigue Performance in Flexure of Fiber Reinforced Concrete

Fatigue Performance in Flexure of Fiber Reinforced Concrete

Abstract

An experimental investigation of the behavior of fiber reinforced concrete under cyclic flexural loading is presented. One type of polypropylene and two types of steel fibers in two different volume concentrations are studied. Load-deflection response is obtained for constant amplitude fatigue loading as well as for static loading. The damage level is recorded under static and fatigue loading using acoustic emission techniques. Data are presented in terms of complete load-deflection diagrams (for static loading) and in terms of S-N diagrams (for fatigue loading). Damage evolution is described in terms of acoustic emission activity as a function of deflection (static loading) or cycles (fatigue loading). The test results show that the addition of steel fibers increases the flexural fatigue strength considerably. Compared with plain concrete, the fatigue strength for 2 million cycles is changed from 60% to 90% of the ultimate flexure strength when the steel fiber content is one volume percent. High-fiber volume concentrations (2%) further increase absolute fatigue strength; however, fatigue performance measured relative to the static strength is decreased compared with the lower fiber volume concentration. Furthermore, the results show that the accumulated damage level at failure in the static test of unreinforced concrete is of the same order of magnitude as in the fatigue testing of the same material. However, using fiber reinforced concrete, the accumulated damage level in fatigue testing is 1-2 order of magnitude higher than the level reached in static testing of the same material. Finally, the tests show that the deflection at failure of the fiber reinforced concrete specimens under constant stress range fatigue loading can be predicted using the static load-deflection curve, provided the testing time is short enough to neglect creep effects.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!