Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Shear Strengthening Effects with Varying Types of FRP Materials and Strengthening Methods

Shear Strengthening Effects with Varying Types of FRP Materials and Strengthening Methods

Abstract

Synopsis: The FRP system is a good alternative of the traditional shear strengthening technique. This study evaluates the shear strengthening effects on the reinforced concrete beams strengthened with varying types of FRP materials, CFRP, CFS and GFRP. The entire strengthened specimens were failed in the mode of brittle shear failure with debonding of the FRP materials. The shear capacities were improved mostly by more than 54%. The different types of the strengthening materials did not yield a noticeable difference in the shear strengthening effect. The orientation of the fibers, however, was found to be an important factor. With a 45° fiber orientation, greater strengthening effect and better control on the shear crack propagation were observed. A numerical model predicting the shear capacity of the shear-strengthened beams was suggested along with the strength efficiency factor from the test results. The predictions were in good agreement with the test results.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!