
doi: 10.14359/13453
Horizontal cracking (HC) at the depth of longitudinal steel in continuously reinforced concrete pavements (CRCP) was not known until 1999, when HC was observed in the section on IH 35 in the Waco District. At that time, no prior research was done on this topic and no reports published. Concerned about this type of cracking and its effect on the long-term performance of CRCP, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) initiated this research study. The primary objective of this study was to identify the mechanism of HC in CRCP due to environmental loading (temperature and moisture variations). To this end, a numerical model was developed to predict the risk of HC in CRCP. Laboratory and field testing was also conducted to evaluate the actual behavior of concrete near longitudinal steel. The measured data was used to develop and validate a numerical model for the prediction of HC potential in CRCP. The mechanism of vertical stress development in concrete near longitudinal steel was investigated with a comprehensive numerical analysis. The results of the study indicate that pavement design, more specifically longitudinal steel design, concrete material properties such as coefficient thermal expansion (CoTE), modulus of elasticity, drying shrinkage and strength, and construction quality such as curing and temperature control, all have effects on HC development. Two-mat steel, lower values of CoTE and drying shrinkage and modulus, higher strength of concrete, good quality curing and temperature control will lower the potential for HC. Since there are almost an infinite number of combinations of design, materials and construction variables during the construction of CRCP, more general guidelines rather than prescriptive ones were developed. The guidelines cover three areas – pavement design, materials and construction quality. The implementation of the guidelines is expected to minimize the occurrence of horizontal cracking in CRCP.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
