
doi: 10.1429/26965
handle: 11588/325430 , 11367/3296
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the robustness of the theory that claims restrictive effects of expansionary fiscal policy. It shows that such so-called “non-Keynesian effects” may arise from synchronous and opposite monetary policy interventions. The paper demonstrates this conclusion through a stylized model – supported by an empirical investigation on ECB and FED reaction functions – in which Central Banks consider deficit spending as an element that generates inflation expectations. Econometric analysis also shows that the ECB reacts asymmetrically to deficit spending variations while the FED has a linear reaction to this indicator.
Politica fiscale, Politica fiscale; politica monetaria, Fiscal policy, Monetary policy, Central Banks Policy strategies, politica monetaria, Fiscal policy; Monetary policy; Central Banks Policy strategies, jel: jel:E62, jel: jel:E63, jel: jel:E52, jel: jel:E58
Politica fiscale, Politica fiscale; politica monetaria, Fiscal policy, Monetary policy, Central Banks Policy strategies, politica monetaria, Fiscal policy; Monetary policy; Central Banks Policy strategies, jel: jel:E62, jel: jel:E63, jel: jel:E52, jel: jel:E58
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
