Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Star counts in M31

Authors: Hodder, Philip Jeremy Crichton;
Abstract

The structural properties of external galaxies may be investigated using a model to generate the predicted number of stars as a function of apparent magnitude in any field in the galaxy. An implementation of such a model is explained in detail and is then tested against observations of M31. These data consist of several CCD images of several fields in M31 along the minor axis, with one field along a “diagonal”. Additional data for 5 fields along the major axis was also made available. Modelling of two galaxy components — the spheroid and the disk — is undertaken. A spheroid density normalization of 3.1 x 10⁻⁶ stars pc⁻³ at 10 kpc is derived for two of the spheroid fields. The data for the field along the diagonal gives a density approximately 1.5 greater than this, possibly implying that the spheroid of M31 is inhomogenous. The spheroid axial ratio can be constrained to between 0.4 and 0.7, values similar to previous works. The effective radius cannot be constrained as well because it has a much smaller effect on the observed number counts. It is also noted that changes in these parameters can compensate for changes in the density normalization. Modeffing the disk counts is more problematical — the reasons for this are discussed in some detail. The disk density normalization is found to be approximately 1.5 x 10⁻⁴ stars pc⁻³ at 10 kpc giving a disk to spheroid density ratio of about 48:1. Using models run over grids of scale height and scale length it is found that the scale height is limited to between 50 and 400 pc, the scale length constrained to between 5 and 7 kpc.

Countries
United States, Canada, Canada, Mexico
Keywords

520

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!