
doi: 10.14273/unisa-2034
handle: 11571/571684
In the present paper we provide an explanation of why privatization may attract foreign investors willing to enter a regional market. Privatization turns the formerly-public rm into a less aggressive competitor since pro t-maximizing output is lower than the welfare-maximizing one. The drawback is that social welfare generally decreases. We also investigate tax/subsidy competition for FDI and put forward its potentially positive role. On the one hand, it may reduce the negative impact on welfare of an FDIattracting privatization. On the other hand, it may prevent a welfare-reducing investment by the foreign rm. This shows that privatization and scal policies may be either alternative or complementary instruments depending on the government's objective (i.e., country's attractiveness for foreign investors and domestic welfare).
330, Tax/Subsidy Competition, HB, Foreign Direct Investment, Foreign direct investment, Privatization, Economic Theory, Tax/Subsidy competition
330, Tax/Subsidy Competition, HB, Foreign Direct Investment, Foreign direct investment, Privatization, Economic Theory, Tax/Subsidy competition
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
