Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Critical Review of In-Situ Leach Uranium Mining Practices

Authors: Farrant, Adrian Ronald;

Critical Review of In-Situ Leach Uranium Mining Practices

Abstract

In-Situ Leaching (ISL) involves the extraction of uranium by delivering a solution through well bores into an underground uranium ore-body. The solution dissolves the uranium and is intercepted and pumped to the surface for processing. The ISL process is an economically attractive method for extracting uranium ore from low-strength saturated sands or sandstones. The nature of the process, however, is such that it requires an ore deposit to occur in permeable saturated sands, which introduces elements of environmental risk to groundwater systems.This report reviews the practice of ISL uranium mining and its application to Australian uranium deposits. Environmental concerns are discussed, including:• Groundwater sources and use;• Groundwater contamination;• Excursions of leach solution;• Radiological contamination;• Regulation and oversight; and• Rehabilitation.Details of measures in place in Australia to limit these risks are presented in conjunction with applicable Australian legislation and regulation. Previous experience over the last forty years of ISL mining has been reviewed and evaluated with a view to understanding why many mines have left a legacy of contamination and others have been successfully rehabilitated.Based on available literature and lessons gleaned from early practice of the method, this review concludes that In-Situ Leach mining of uranium would be beneficial to the Australian uranium industry and that the processes currently used are superior to conventional mining methods. Environmental risks are evident, as they are in any project, but the current legislation, regulation and environmental protection processes satisfactorily address and minimize these risks.

Country
Australia
Related Organizations
Keywords

091405 Mining Engineering, Uranium, School of Engineering, 0913 Mechanical Engineering

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!