
handle: 20.500.12403/6114
Objective: This study was performed to examine the relationship between thirst distress and severity and compliance with fluid control and interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) in patients receiving outpatient hemodialysis (HD) treatment. Methods: This two-center, descriptive and cross-sectional study was completed with 148 patients receiving outpatient HD treatment. The data were collected by using the “patient introduction form”, the “thirst distress scale (TDS)”, the “fluid control scale in hemodialysis patients (FCSHP)”, the “visual analog scale (VAS)”. IDWG was calculated as the difference between the weight before HD and the weight recorded after the previous session; the mean of sessions over 3 months was recorded. Independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA test, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to evaluate the data, and Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between the scales. Results: According to the results, the mean TDS score was 21.67±5.02, the mean VAS score was 4.62±1.68, the mean FCHPS total scale score was 44.86±6.80, the mean FCHPS behavior subscale score was 22.14±5.74, the mean FCHPS knowledge subscale score was 12.54±2.79, and the mean FCHPS attitude subscale score was 10.17±2.76. A negative correlation was found between TDS scores and FCHPS total scores, FCHPS subscale knowledge scores and FCHPS subscale attitude scores, and IDWG and FCHPS subscale attitude scores. A positive correlation was also found between the VAS score and IDWG. Conclusion: Thirst distress was higher than the moderate level in HD patients, and IDWG increased as thirst severity (VAS score) increased.
Medicine (General), hemodialysis, R5-920, thirst, MORTALITY, weight gain, XEROSTOMIA, xerostomia, drinkings, DISEASE, SCALE, ULTRAFILTRATION
Medicine (General), hemodialysis, R5-920, thirst, MORTALITY, weight gain, XEROSTOMIA, xerostomia, drinkings, DISEASE, SCALE, ULTRAFILTRATION
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
