
doi: 10.14201/alh.26419
handle: 10366/165102 , 10366/160214
Este artículo estudia los marcos interpretativos utilizados por los presidentes de Argentina, Brasil, Chile y México durante los meses iniciales del COVID-19, con el objetivo de caracterizar y comparar estrategias discursivas, así como explorar qué factores explican las distintas aproximaciones. La conclusión preliminar es que las diferencias se deben tanto a razones ideológicas como a otros factores contextuales y de disponibilidad de recursos.
pol?tica comparada, presidencialismo, frame analysis, política comparada, an?lisis de discurso, marcos interpretativos, public sphere, comparative politics, esfera p?blica, análisis de discurso, discourse analysis, esfera pública, presidentialism
pol?tica comparada, presidencialismo, frame analysis, política comparada, an?lisis de discurso, marcos interpretativos, public sphere, comparative politics, esfera p?blica, análisis de discurso, discourse analysis, esfera pública, presidentialism
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
