
doi: 10.1415/86444
handle: 11368/2917578
This paper, originally a presentation of Luigi Ferrajoli’s La logica del diritto. Dieci aporie nell’opera di Hans Kelsen (2016), compares the jurisprudences of the two authors, by problematizing their disagreements on the relationship between existence and validity of norms. Although both aim to formulate a general jurisprudence, their theories of law are on very different subjects. Reine Recthslehre concerns especially the law of legislative State, Ferrajoli’s garantism, instead, the law of Constitutional State.
validity, Legislative State, Legislative State; Constitutional State; validity; existence of a norm, existence of a norm, Constitutional State
validity, Legislative State, Legislative State; Constitutional State; validity; existence of a norm, existence of a norm, Constitutional State
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
