
doi: 10.1413/10765
The calculus quarrel and the ensuing controversy between Leibniz and Clarke was just the beginning of the less-known story of the reception of the Newtonian synthesis in German eighteenth-century culture. The present essay deals with the Wolffian-Newtonian debate in the correspondance between Voltaire, Frederick II and Mme du Châtelet during the years 1736-40. Voltaire's role in the young Kronprinz's education was pivotal, especially in convincing the pupil of the superiority of Newton's natural philosophy in comparison with Wolff's metaphysics. In 1740, the new king of Prussia, following Voltaire's suggestions, trusted the reformed Akademie der Wissenschaften in Berlin to the leading Newtonian French scientist P. Moreau de Maupertuis. As a consequence, Wolff and his metaphysics were discredited within the academy, and the Wolffian school philosophy collapsed under the attacks of the great methematician L. Euler. In this way Frederick's cosmopolitan Elnlightenment promoted a full reception of the Newtonian physics, which was considered as a methodological model of both metaphysical and physical research by the young Kant and his contemporaries who rejected the old dogmatic philosoophy.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
