Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The End of Endogamy? Two Centuries of Kin Marriage in the Netherlands (1812-2021)

Two centuries of kin marriage in The Netherlands (1812-2021)
Authors: Bras, Hilde; de Bel, Vera;

The End of Endogamy? Two Centuries of Kin Marriage in the Netherlands (1812-2021)

Abstract

Prior research on consanguinity and kin marriage in Western societies has remained surprisingly silent on the postwar period, when kin endogamy is often believed to have become completely obsolete. In this study, we combine historical and contemporary data to chart and understand long durée changes in the incidence of different types of kin marriage in the Netherlands from the 1840s until today. Our study shows that cousin marriages comprised 2.7% of all unions during the 1871-1880 period and decreased to approximately 1.5% during the 1911-1922 period. Sibling set exchange marriages peaked at 4.7% in the last decade of the nineteenth century, after which they declined to 2.8% between 1911-1922. Surprisingly, despite this overall decline, a slight resurgence in sibling set exchange partnerships occurred in the 1970s and 1980s among the members of the baby boom generation. Moreover, cousin marriages saw a slight rise among those born in the 1970s, possibly partly as a result of import marriages among migrant groups. Kinship availability, religious-ideological group formation, and class- and education-based assortative mating explain these different trends, often reinforcing each other, and thereby producing specific spatial patterns of kin marriage. Our findings show that trends and patterns of kin endogamy were highly path-dependent and may wax and wane conditional on historical circumstances.

Country
Netherlands
Related Organizations
Keywords

Consanguinity, Sibling set exchange marriage, Consanguineous marriage, 19th century, Kin marriage, 20th century, The Netherlands, Kin endogamy, Cousin marriage

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!