
doi: 10.1400/68515
The category of totalitarism since the Eighties has been brought back to the center of political science literature (and not only). This has happened after a period of widespread hostility toward the category itself, during which it has been discussed (especially by historians) its analytical worth and its ideological contamination, beside its revisionist vocation. The review shows, making reference to some books that offer an assessment of this development, how in recent years relevant philosophical interpretations of the totalitarian phenomenon set the direction of historiographic and sociological research: on the one side, linking together Arendt’s and Foucault’s approaches, on the other, reintroducing the key of political religions, developed in the Thirties, to remain reductively linked to Eric Voegelin’s works.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
