Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Confronti tra metodi per l'individuazione di osservazioni anomale in indagini longitudinali: proposte teoriche e verifiche empiriche

Authors: Gismondi, Roberto;

Confronti tra metodi per l'individuazione di osservazioni anomale in indagini longitudinali: proposte teoriche e verifiche empiriche

Abstract

If the main purpose of a sampling survey consists in the estimation of a change (from time t-k to time t) concerning a certain quantitative variable y, the presence of outliers could lead to significant biases in the estimation process. In this paper we’ll deal with the first problem, since we adopted the rule that if a unit is identified as outlier, we exclude it from any further calculation, so we assign to it a weight equal to zero. Starting from a lightly improved version of a basic data transformation originally proposed by Hidiroglou and Berthelot, we present a new technique for detecting outliers (minimum variance procedure), that generally leads to a significantly lower amount of units identified as outliers and of micro-data reject. Moreover, we propose various qualitative indicators to assess the optimality of any outlier detection method. Finally, starting from the availability of monthly data concerned with the retail trade monthly survey currently carried out by ISTAT, we compare nine methods for identifying outliers, drawing some main conclusions on the optimality of procedures based on the proposed minimum variance procedure.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!