
doi: 10.1400/272558
handle: 11584/241253
This article discusses some problems involved in the relationship between textual criticism and philosophical interpretation, evoking observations by Eugenio Garin, Giorgio Pasquali, Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer. Such an investigation aims at challenging a persistent, common bias: that the clarification of readings and borrowings identifiable in a book represents a preliminary field of research, useful to prepare the note apparatus and obtain a critical edition, but condemned to remain separate from the general interpretation of the text. © 2017 Casa Editrice le Lettere. All rights reserved.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
