Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Temporal Progress and Integrated Management of Frosty Pod Rot (Moniliophthora roreri) of Cocoa in Tabasco, Mexico

Authors: Torres de la Cruz, M.; Ortiz García, C.F.; Téliz Ortiz, D.; Mora Aguilera, A.; Nava Díaz, C.;

Temporal Progress and Integrated Management of Frosty Pod Rot (Moniliophthora roreri) of Cocoa in Tabasco, Mexico

Abstract

Frosty pod rot of cocoa, induced by Moniliophthora roreri. has become the principal parasitic limitation for cocoa production in Tabasco (Mexico), which has prompted studies on its temporal progress and management. The temporal progress was desumed from estimation of the percentage of diseased fruits in three fruit flushes in the production cycle of 2008-09, whereas a regional management was compared with an Integrated Crop Management (ICM) in two systems of shade (50 and 70%). Three epidemics occurred from May 2008 to April 2009 with crop losses of over 70%. The epidemics occurred during 11 consecutive months associated with cool temperature (20-26.9oC) and relative humidity (higher than 90%) 49 days prior to the appearance of the symptoms. The ICM treatment with 50% shade showed a protection effectiveness of 90%. The reduction of shade to 50% alone reduced the incidence of frosty pod rot by 20%. The results suggest the convenience of independent management of the epidemics and the advantage of the following integrated control measures in each of the three fruit flush periods: weekly removal of diseased fruits, pruning of lateral and internal branches, reduction of tree height to 4 m, total elimination of fruits in low production period (purge), treatment of eliminated fruits and harvested litter with 15% urea, a single application with Azoxystrobin (250 g a.i./ha) to fruits under two months of age, and after it, three monthly sprays with copper hydroxide (1500 g a.i./ha). Additionally, weed control and improvement of soil drainage were implemented in both ICM and regional treatments.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!