Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Advances in Horticul...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Pepper and tomato cultivar responses to inoculation with Glomus intraradices

Authors: Nemec, S:; Datnoff, L.;

Pepper and tomato cultivar responses to inoculation with Glomus intraradices

Abstract

Commercial tomato and bell pepper cultivars grown in Florida were inoculated with Glomus intraradices in greenhouses to determine relative dependency (RD) of the cultivars to the fungus. Dry shoot RD ratings for seven pepper cultivars ranged from 17.4 to 49.9. Fresh root weight RD ratings were lower, but did not alter the relative rankings of the two most dependent cultivars, Bell Captain and Early Calwonder. Dry shoot RD ratings for nine tomato cultivars ranged from 13.7 to -20.9. Heatwave was the most dependent using shoot weight and fresh root weight parameters, and Bonita the least. RD of cultivars was not related to plant size because Bell Captain was the tallest and Early Calwonder the shortest. Levels of G. intraradices infection in roots were not correlated with RD ratings. These data suggest that pepper cultivars may be more responsive to VAM fungus infection in the field than tomato cultivars.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Published in a Diamond OA journal