
doi: 10.1400/107016
handle: 2158/347874
With a view to drawing up digitised maps of liquefaction risk along the Romagna coast, for which about eight hundred cone penetration tests (CPT) are available, four different methods based on CPT to evaluate safety factor profiles are analysed and compared. The methods considered are those proposed by (1) Robertson and Wride (1997), (2) Suzuki et a!. (1997), (3) Shibata and Teparaska (1988), and (4) Olsen (1997). The synthetic index introduced by Iwasaki et al. (1978), representative of the liquefaction potential in corre¬spondence with every profile explored by means of CPT, was employed for drawing up the digitised liquefac¬tion risk maps. Up until now, one hundred mechanical cone penetration tests have been digitised. The afore¬said four methods have been applied to these tests. A comparison of these methods points out a substantial agreement between the results.
soil liquefaction; simplified methods; earthquake engineering
soil liquefaction; simplified methods; earthquake engineering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
