
AbstractThis article was presented, in draft form, as a paper at the November 2001 AMPE conference. The article critiques different modes of analysis in the field of digital aesthetics. The article argues that there is a desperate need to devise and promote student/staff training in technological/cultural aesthetics that liberate rather than simply anaesthetize. As interactive packages develop into the future there will be a need for criticism not only of the content they may contain but also their ability to enable production of content. These analytical tools are needed in the creation of such generative packages. The motivation for this approach is to help to create methodologies that are challenging, generative and actionable. There are opportunities for the development of digital aesthetics of production.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
