Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Gastric Mucosal Changes following Gastroplasty: A Comparative Study between Vertical Banded Gastroplasty and Silastic Ring Vertical Gastroplasty

Authors: , Negri; , Bendet; , Halevy; , Halpern; , Reif; , Bogokovsky; , Scapa;

Gastric Mucosal Changes following Gastroplasty: A Comparative Study between Vertical Banded Gastroplasty and Silastic Ring Vertical Gastroplasty

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term changes of gastric mucosa following surgery for morbid obesity have never been studied, to the best of our knowledge. As 31 patients in our series presented with various gastrointestinal complaints following surgery, we used this opportunity to study mucosal changes. METHODS: Thirty-seven gastroscopies were performed on 31 patients, 20 patients following Vertical Banded Gastroplasty (VBG) and 11 patients following Silastic Ring Vertical Gastroplasty (SRVG) with various gastrointestinal complaints. Macroscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa was examined and biopsies taken from the proximal gastric pouch, the transitional zone and distal stomach. RESULTS: In most patients, macroscopic appearance of the proximal and distal pouches was normal. Pathological findings were mainly located in the transitional zone and were found mainly in the VBG group. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that damage to the gastric mucosa is related to the surgical technique, and mainly to the strip of mesh used in the VBG patients. Since hyperplasia and metaplasia were among the microscopic findings, a question is raised about the possibility of malignant transformation. We suggest that routine post-operative gastroscopies be considered, especially following VBG.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!